Friday
May 29, 1846
The daily union (Washington [D.C.]) — District Of Columbia, Washington D.C.
“When Daniel Webster Exploded on the Senate Floor: The Territorial Gamble That Nearly Broke Congress (1846)”
Art Deco mural for May 29, 1846
Original newspaper scan from May 29, 1846
Original front page — The daily union (Washington [D.C.]) — Click to enlarge
Full-size newspaper scan
What's on the Front Page

The front page is dominated by a scorching Senate floor speech from John A. Dickinson of New York, delivered April 9, 1846, in which he defends himself against a withering personal attack from Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts over the Ashburton Treaty. Dickinson had previously criticized the treaty—which settled the disputed northeastern boundary between the U.S. and British Canada—as a humiliating concession that gave away Maine territory, failed to secure reparations for the destruction of the steamship *Caroline*, and left unresolved the volatile "right of search" issue that amounted to British impressment of American sailors. Webster apparently erupted in fury, launching what Dickinson describes as an unprecedented breach of Senate decorum: "a grossness of manner, a defiance of tone, and a virulence of language" that had no parallel in legislative history. Dickinson methodically dismantles Webster's attack, arguing his original speech contained only factual, unemotional critiques of the negotiations and that Webster fabricated pretexts for assault—including falsely accusing Dickinson of inserting the word "express" into a quote from Congressman Charles J. Ingersoll's remarks about the McLeod affair.

Why It Matters

This Senate clash captures America at a crossroads in 1846—freshly engaged in territorial expansion but bitterly divided over how aggressively to pursue it. The Ashburton Treaty and the unresolved Oregon Question were fracturing the nation along sectional lines. Webster, a Massachusetts Federalist and nationalist, represented Northern merchant and diplomatic interests favoring compromise with Britain to preserve trade and stability. Dickinson, from New York, spoke for a more expansionist, aggressive posture. The McLeod affair—the British destruction of the *Caroline*, an American vessel allegedly harboring Canadian rebels—had inflamed passions about American sovereignty and impressment. Just weeks after this speech, America would declare war on Mexico, making this moment of Senate fury a snapshot of the ideological fault lines that would define the next two decades and ultimately lead to civil war.

Hidden Gems
  • The paper cost 6¼ cents per copy or $5 per year for daily delivery—yet still had to aggressively warn subscribers: 'The name of no person will be entered upon our books unless the payment of the subscription be made in advance.' Credit was genuinely dangerous for newspapers in the 1840s.
  • The *Daily Union* was published tri-weekly during Congressional sessions and semi-weekly in recess—meaning Washington had to shut down its news cycle when Congress wasn't in session, a stark reminder that the capital was a part-time city.
  • Postmasters acted as both mail carriers and newspaper agents, and their receipts counted as legal proof of subscription payment—the federal post office was the infrastructure backbone of the newspaper business itself.
  • The paper offered 'a liberal discount to those who advertise by the year,' suggesting that even in 1846, sustained advertising was more valuable than one-off placements, establishing the modern media business model.
  • Dickinson's speech runs to extraordinary length—printed across multiple columns with dense arguments about specific treaty clauses—yet this was considered normal Senate oratory for the era, when speeches regularly lasted hours and were published verbatim in newspapers.
Fun Facts
  • Daniel Webster, the Massachusetts senator Dickinson was attacking, would die in 1852 without ever fully resolving his ideological battles over expansionism and slavery—his death marked the effective end of the Whig Party he helped lead, and would be mourned as the death of the old Union itself.
  • The specific territorial dispute Dickinson mentions—Maine versus British Canada—had nearly triggered war just four years earlier in the 'Aroostook War' of 1842, which is why Webster negotiated the Ashburton Treaty in the first place; his opponents like Dickinson saw it as surrender rather than settlement.
  • The *Caroline* incident that Dickinson references had occurred in 1837, but was still a raw wound in 1846—British soldiers had destroyed the American merchant ship to stop Canadian rebels from using it; Alexander McLeod, a British deputy sheriff, was indicted for murder and the case became an international crisis about whether British agents could face American justice.
  • Dickinson's invocation of Charles J. Ingersoll, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, shows that this wasn't just a Senate squabble—the treaty was dividing both chambers of Congress and threatening to become a major campaign issue heading into the 1846 midterms and 1848 presidential race.
  • The vitriol on display here—Dickinson accusing Webster of 'empty and insincere' pretenses, Webster's apparently hour-long denunciation—reflects the fact that Senate debates in the 1840s were genuinely personal feuds that could derail legislation; civility had already begun eroding as slavery and expansion questions polarized the nation.
Contentious Politics Federal Diplomacy Politics International Legislation
May 28, 1846 May 30, 1846

Also on May 29

View all 11 years →

Wake Up to History

Every morning: one front page from exactly 100 years ago, with context, hidden gems, and an original Art Deco mural. Free.

Subscribe Free