The Worcester Daily Spy's front page is dominated by a scathing critique of America's Indian policy, detailing the spectacular failures of recent military campaigns in the Northwest. The anonymous correspondent reports that General Sully's seven-month expedition with 1,063 officers and men marched over 1,500 miles without killing a single Indian—except possibly one "friendly and foolish" rider shot after the campaign ended. The math is brutal: with six regiments costing $2 million each annually, the government spent $12 million to kill perhaps 25 Indians total—roughly half a million dollars per death. The piece reserves particular condemnation for Colonel Chivington's massacre at Sand Creek, where 700-800 well-armed soldiers with artillery attacked a peaceful Cheyenne camp. Despite being completely surprised, 65 Indian defenders held off Chivington for hours, allowing 800 women and children to escape before 20 warriors finally broke free alive. The writer argues this "extermination policy" has failed because Indians "are human" and "will die rather than yield a cowardly submission to oppression." Meanwhile, tucked below this serious political commentary is a whimsical poem about having a head cold, complete with references to stuffed noses and running eyes.
This brutal assessment of Indian policy appears just seven months after the Civil War ended, as America grappled with how to handle its western expansion. The Sand Creek Massacre had occurred in November 1864, and by late 1865, the public was beginning to reckon with reports of military atrocities against Native Americans. This critique reflects a growing debate about whether the U.S. should pursue extermination or accommodation with Indian tribes—a question that would define the next three decades of westward expansion and ultimately lead to the reservation system.
Every morning: one front page from exactly 100 years ago, with context, hidden gems, and an original Art Deco mural. Free.
Subscribe Free