“1846: One Man's Savage Defense of John Tyler—Plus: Why Chinese Doctors Cured Patients Better Than Europeans”
What's on the Front Page
The Sunday Dispatch leads with a sweeping political essay titled "Reminiscences and Random Recollections of the Tyler Administration," written by Horace Walpole and addressed to Henry A. Wise, the U.S. Minister to Brazil. This is Chapter 19 of what appears to be an ongoing historical serialization examining President John Tyler's tumultuous tenure (1841-1845). Walpole offers a surprisingly sympathetic reassessment of Tyler, crediting him with major achievements: the annexation of Texas, settlement of the North-Eastern Boundary dispute with Britain, and crucially, the defeat of Henry Clay's National Bank proposal. The piece is laced with classical allusions and bitter recounting of how the Whig Party, which had accidentally elevated Tyler to power after William Henry Harrison's death, turned viciously against him when he refused to be their puppet. A second major feature examines Chinese medicine through Davis's *History of China*, marveling at how Chinese physicians successfully treat patients through diet, sleep, and herbal simples—while European doctors kill patients through bloodletting and aggressive "Sangrado" methods. The comparison is withering toward Western medicine's pretensions.
Why It Matters
This May 1846 edition captures a pivotal moment in American political realignment. Tyler had left office just months earlier (March 1845), and the Democratic Party—which had benefited from Whig infighting—was consolidating power. The Texas annexation mentioned here would trigger the Mexican-American War, set to begin within weeks of this publication. Walpole's grudging respect for Tyler's firmness reflects broader anxieties about executive power and party loyalty in a young republic still defining its constitutional limits. The parallel essay on Chinese medicine, meanwhile, reflects growing intellectual ferment in America about whether European expertise—medical, political, social—was truly superior, or whether non-Western knowledge deserved serious consideration. This was radical questioning for 1846.
Hidden Gems
- The Sunday Dispatch cost three cents per week for city subscribers, or one dollar per year by mail—this was premium pricing for a single-issue newspaper in 1846, suggesting it was a quality publication aimed at educated readers willing to pay for political analysis.
- Walpole's essay is deliberately published as an open letter to Henry A. Wise, who was serving as Minister Extraordinary to Brazil—using the newspaper as a vehicle for quasi-diplomatic correspondence, suggesting the porous boundary between journalism and statecraft.
- The Chinese medicine section dismissively references 'Sangrado'—a character from Lesage's *Gil Blas* famous for killing patients through excessive bloodletting—as a coded critique of contemporary European medical malpractice, a shockingly modern form of satire for a newspaper.
- The paper was published at 41 Ann Street in lower Manhattan by Williamson Burns Watson, and cost only one dollar per square (16 lines) for the first ad insertion—meaning local merchants could afford modest advertising, democratizing the medium.
- Walpole's bitter final passage mimics Queen Elizabeth's denunciation of the Countess of Nottingham ('May God forgive them, for I never can'), turning literary quotation into a weapon against Whig Party hypocrisy—high culture deployed as political ammunition in a weekly newspaper.
Fun Facts
- Horace Walpole claims Tyler 'led the way, and consummated the Annexation of Texas'—this happened in March 1845, and within months (May 1846, when this was published) America declared war on Mexico. Tyler's Texas gambit directly triggered the conflict that would reshape the continent and intensify slavery debates.
- The essay's contempt for Henry Clay reflects Clay's actual political destruction: he would lose the 1844 presidential race to Democrat James K. Polk, despite being the Whig frontrunner. Clay's career never recovered from this defeat, and he died a broken man in 1852—Walpole's crowing was prescient.
- The Chinese medicine discussion cites Dr. Abel's observations from Canton, a port that had just opened wider to Western trade after the First Opium War (1840-1842)—so Walpole is weaponizing British imperial contact to argue that Western 'superiority' was a myth.
- Walpole references 'Simon de Montfort' as a legacy in blood, invoking the 13th-century English barons' revolt—using medieval English history to frame contemporary American party politics as cosmic betrayal.
- The paper's publication price of three cents per week was roughly equivalent to $0.90 in today's money, yet it contained sophisticated political analysis and medical philosophy—suggesting 1840s newspapers were far more intellectually demanding than their modern descendants.
Wake Up to History
Every morning: one front page from exactly 100 years ago, with context, hidden gems, and an original Art Deco mural. Free.
Subscribe Free